Three questions on building the early team

What makes a founding team work?

Twenty years in, and I still think it comes down to two things nobody can manufacture in a hurry: complementary craft, and blind trust in the other person’s integrity.

The complementary part is easy enough to talk about… you need people who cover the parts of the map you can’t read. But the second one – that quiet certainty that when you’re not in the room, the other person will still do the right thing – you can’t interview for that. You can only have already seen it. Which is why almost every founding team that actually holds comes out of some shared history: colleagues who survived a bad quarter together, college friends, people who’ve known each other long enough that the masks came off years ago.

When we started Airmeet, Vinay and Manoj weren’t a hiring decision. They were colleagues at CommonFloor whom I’d already watched in the trenches – I’d seen how they behaved when things were breaking, when a deadline was ugly, when there was no credit going around. That’s the résumé that matters. Not what someone has built, but who they were while building it.

And there’s a similarity to family here that my wife would laugh at me for making in a startup conversation… you’re not signing up for the good years. You’re signing up for the 3 AM version of each other. Deep respect for each other’s craft is what gets you into the boat. Blind trust in each other’s integrity is what keeps you in it when the boat starts taking water.

Sometimes I wonder if we’re all just looking for a handful of people we don’t have to keep verifying. Almost everything good gets built in the space that saves.

How does hiring change when you’re building zero to one?

Hiring for 0 to 1 is a genuinely different sport, and I’ve watched good founders confuse it with the other one and pay for it. Myself included, more than once.

0 to 1 is navigation. You know roughly where you want to end up, but the road isn’t drawn yet – you take turns, hit dead ends, reverse out of lanes that looked promising for a whole month. 1 to 100 is acceleration. The road exists. The job is to go faster on it, with discipline. Those two need different nervous systems.

For the navigation phase you want people who are at peace with iteration… who don’t experience a reversal as failure but as information. And they have to be secure in their craft. Not there to learn, not there to prove anything. Someone who still needs to prove themselves will quietly fight for their own idea to be the right one, and in 0 to 1 you need people who can kill their own idea by Thursday without flinching. Junior folks, interns – absolutely, they belong and they should be learning. Just not in the core, not in that phase.

The other thing I’ve come to value more with each company: hire from the domain early. Someone who has actually lived the problem cuts months off your discovery, because they arrive carrying half your customer research in their bones. And they bring their relationships with them – the market walks in the door attached to the person.

Honestly, some of this I learned watching my five-year-old with a jigsaw. She tries a piece, it doesn’t fit, she sets it down and picks up another one with zero drama about it. My eight-year-old, who now knows enough to have opinions, will sit there and insist a piece must fit. That first temperament is what 0 to 1 runs on. We spend years training it out of people and then go looking for it in interviews.

What have you learned about identifying people who can build alongside you when there’s no established playbook?

Back in 2019 we were telling people we were building a place for meetups and events that lived entirely on the internet, and I watched a lot of polite faces do that thing where they nod and then change the subject. There was no playbook because there was no category – no comparable to point at, no analyst report to hide behind.

What that stretch taught me is that when there’s no map, alignment on the destination matters far less than alignment on the first principles. Your people will each carry a different picture of the final product, and that’s fine, that’s healthy even, because none of you can actually see it yet. What cannot differ is the underlying argument for why the thing must exist at all. Two people who agree on fundamentals and disagree on the roadmap will converge. Two people who agree on the roadmap and disagree on the fundamentals will break at the first hard pivot.

The second thing – and this is the one I’d screen hardest for – is whether the person can personally relate to the problem. At Airmeet we were a bunch of nerds and engineers who had been quietly wanting a remote, digital-nomad kind of life for years. So the product was never a thesis to us. It was our own itch. Which meant that when the market shrugged in 2019, we didn’t need anyone’s validation to keep going… we already believed the need was real, because we were the need.

Then March 2020 arrived and the whole world showed up at our door, and I try to be careful about the lesson I draw from that, because it’s tempting to draw the flattering one. We’d have been right about that need either way. Just on a much slower timeline.

The line I still watch is the thin one between stubbornness and conviction, and I’ve been on the wrong side of it too. Stubbornness is refusing to update on evidence. Conviction is refusing to update on the absence of applause.

So – shared first principles, and a personal relationship with the problem. When there’s no playbook, everything else is negotiable. Those two aren’t.

About Lalit Mangal and CommonFloor, Airmeet & AirPulse.ai

Lalit Mangal is a serial entrepreneur who co-founded and scaled Commonfloor one of India’s early real-estate technology platforms, before co-founding Airmeet, a virtual events platform built for engaging online experiences. Today, he is building AirPulse.ai, helping brands strengthen their visibility and presence across ChatGPT and other AI-driven search and discovery platforms.

The CX Founder & Industry Voices Series: CareerXperts brings together founders / Industry leaders to share their perspectives on building from 0→1, hiring and building teams, and the talent realities shaping their industries.

Each edition offers a first-hand view of the people, decisions and experiences behind an industry – and the changing world of talent around it.

Explore more stories, perspectives and conversations from founders, entrepreneurs, technologists, leaders and professionals – across startups, careers, technology and the world of work. Visit our blog here: CareerXperts Blog